Ohio Alliance for Arts Education
September 17, 2012
Joan Platz
Arts on Line Education Update
Summit on Preserving Our Public Schools
The Ohio Coalition for Equity & Adequacy of School Funding, Bill Phillis, Executive Director, is hosting a “Summit on Preserving Public Schools” on October 16, 2012 at the Bridgewater Banquet & Conference Center, 10561 Sawmill Parkway, Powell, OH 43065 from 9:30 AM to 2:00 PM.
The featured speaker is Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of education at New York University and nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institute in Washington, D.C.
Dr. Ravitch is well-known as an outspoken proponent of public education and critic of corporate education reform and the movement to privatize education. She has written several books and articles about America’s education system, including The Death and Life of the Great American School System and shares the “Bridging Differences” blog with Deborah Meier for Education Week.
The program includes a Keynote Address; Group Discussion; and Next Steps facilitated by Dennis Willard, Precision Media.
The Luncheon Speakers include
-Todd Alan Price, Professor, National Lewis University, who will speak about “How the Milwaukee Board of Education was Preserved -- Lessons for Ohio” and
-Samuel Kern Alexander, Distinguished Professor, University of Illinois, who will speak about the “Consequences of Privatization of Public Education”
The cost of the summit, which includes lunch, is $20.00.
To register please visit http://goo.gl/nlrHO. The deadline to register is October 5, 2012.
For more information please contact the E & A Coalition at 614-228-6540 and email at ohioeanda@sbcglobal.net.
1)129th Ohio General Assembly: The Ohio House and Senate are not scheduled to meet this week.
•General Assembly Approves Changes in Ohio’s Pension Systems: On September 12, 2012 the Ohio House and Senate approved five pension reform bills: SB340 (Niehaus/Kearney) Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund; SB341 (Niehaus/Kearney) School Employees Retirement System; SB342 (Niehaus/Kearney) State Teachers Retirement System; SB343 (Niehaus/Kearney) Ohio Public Employees Retirement System; and SB345 (Niehaus/Kearney) Highway Patrol Retirement System. The changes in pension laws will ensure that the state retirement systems are solvent in the future by changing the requirements for receiving a pension, increasing contribution rates, increasing the age for retirement, changing cost-of-living increases, etc.
A new provision included in four of the bills, with the exception of SB343, allows the boards of directors of the pension systems to make benefit changes without legislative approval. This change was added to the bills to provide the systems with more flexibility to respond to future funding issues. Governor Kasich is expected to sign the bills into law.
In other action, the Ohio Senate rejected House changes to HB375 (Butler), sale of real estate by school districts to private, nonprofit institutions of higher education. House and Senate differences in the bill are expected to be worked out in a conference committee.
•Task Force Formed to Develop Higher Ed Budget: Governor Kasich has asked the presidents of Ohio’s colleges and universities to form a task force to develop a FY14-15 budget for higher education. The task force will be led by Ohio State University president E. Gordon Gee. Governor Kasich directed the task force to set increasing the graduation rate as its overall priority. The task force will also consider the impact of remediation on the budget, sharing services and facilities, utilizing “core assets” to optimize revenue, and enterprise universities.
•SBE Member Resigns: Dennis Shelton submitted his resignation from the State Board of Education on September 14, 2012. Mr. Shelton is an appointed member whose term ends in December 2014. The position will be filled with an appointment made by Governor Kasich.
2) National News:
•Funding for U.S. Government Extended: The U.S. House approved on September 13, 2012 a continuing resolution to keep the government operating until March 27, 2013 (H. J. Resolution 117). The Senate is expected to vote on the resolution this week. Neither the House or the Senate are expected to complete work on all appropriations measures before the end of the current fiscal year on October 1, 2012, thus requiring this continuing resolution, which will fund the government mostly at FY12 levels. In January 2013, however, automatic budget cuts are set to take effect (sequestration) unless Congress and the President take other actions. Income tax cuts implemented first by President Bush and continued by President Obama are also set to expire in January 2013, unless further action is taken. For more information please visit http://appropriations.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=308400.
3) 2012 Election Update:
•Ballot Rewrite: Pursuant to orders issued by the Ohio Supreme Court, the Ohio Ballot Board, chaired by Secretary of State Jon Husted, met and revised the language for State Issue 2, a proposed constitutional amendment to change the system for drawing congressional and state legislative districts in Ohio on the November 6, 2012 ballot.
The Ohio Supreme Court issued a 6 to 1 decision on September 12, 2012 directing the Ohio Ballot Board to reconvene and rewrite the language for State Issue 2 in response to a suit filed by Voters First, the organization supporting the constitutional amendment. The lawsuit alleged that the ballot language approved by the Ohio Ballot Board did not fairly and accurately describe the amendment. According to the Court, the ballot language contained material omissions and factual inaccuracies.
News services are reporting, however, that Voters First is still not satisfied with the fairness of the language. For more information please visit http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2012/09/ohio_ballot_board_approves_new.html.
•Update on Provisional Ballots: Secretary of State Husted issued a directive to boards of elections on September 11, 2012 to comply with an order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Alegnon Marbly (Service Employees International Union (SEIU) v. Husted) on August 27, 2012 and count provisional ballots miscast due to poll worker error. Secretary Husted is also appealing the order to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
•Judge Denies Stay: U.S. District Court Judge Peter Economus rejected on September 12, 2012 Secretary of State Jon Husted’s request to stay an order restoring early, in-person voting before the November 6, 2012 election. Judge Economus of the U.S. District Court Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division ordered on August 31, 2012 Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted to restore in-person early voting on the weekend and Monday before the November 6, 2012 election. (Obama for America v. Husted). An appeal of the order was also filed by Attorney General Mike DeWine with the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 4, 2012. For information about this ruling, please visit http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/.
4) State Board of Education (SBE) Meeting
The State Board of Education, Debe Terhar president, met on September 10-11, 2012 at the Ohio School for the Deaf, 500 Morse Road, Columbus, OH. The major issues addressed by the State Board at this meeting included the search for a new superintendent to replace Stan Heffner; adoption of the FY14-15 Legislative and Budget Recommendations of the State Board; release of the Local Report Cards; determining a cut score for the Third Grade Reading Guarantee; developing rules to waive Operating Standards; and revising Operating Standards.
Update on the Superintendent’s Search
The State Board of Education’s Executive Committee, chaired by Debe Terhar, agreed to serve as a search committee to hire a superintendent of public instruction to replace Stan Heffner, who retired in August 2012. The Executive Committee will interview on October 7, 2012 at 2:00 PM up to five firms to conduct the search. The selection of a search firm must then be approved by the full Board. The State Board has agreed that Deputy Superintendent Michael Sawyers will serve as Acting Superintendent until a new Superintendent is selected.
FY14-15 Legislative and Budget Recommendations
The State Board of Education approved its FY14-15 Legislative and Budget Recommendations entitled “Start Ready, Graduate Ready” on September 11, 2012 after a two-day discussion about whether or not to include additional funding for the third grade reading guarantee, early childhood education, information technology infrastructure, and the Ohio Young Farmers. A decision about possible increases in these areas was postponed until the SBE meeting in October 2012. The final budget proposal, including line items and legislative recommendations, will not be available until September 24, 2012, because State Board members can submit changes through the end of next week.
The State Board is required by Section 3301.07 of the Ohio Revised Code to prepare “a report on the status, needs, and major problems of the public schools of the state, with recommendations for necessary legislative action.” The time line requires the State Board and other state government departments and agencies to submit legislative and budget recommendations to the Office of Budget and Management (OBM) by October 1, 2012. The OBM then develops a FY14-15 state biennial budget proposal, which Governor Kasich will submit to the General Assembly in February 2013 for consideration.
In June 2012 the State Board received the ODE prepared budget document “Start Ready, Graduate Ready”, and reviewed the document in June, July, August, and September 2012. “Start Ready, Graduate Ready” includes a placeholder amount of $6.860 billion each fiscal year for the Foundation Program until Governor Kasich completes work on a new school funding formula, and addresses other policy goals to continue the reforms underway in the Race to the Top grant and HB153. Funding requests for the General Revenue Fund and the Lottery Profits Education Fund total $14.5 billion for FY14-15. (A breakdown of the $14.5 billion will be provided after the final budget is available.)
In July 2012 the Ohio Department of Education was directed by the OBM to submit two additional budget scenarios: a 90 percent budget based on FY13 appropriations and a 100 percent budget based on FY13 appropriations. These scenarios will also be included in the final budget document.
Additional information about the FY14-15 proposed budget for early childhood education and the Third Grade Reading Guarantee is included below:
-Increases for Early Childhood Education: The ODE recommended an increase in early childhood education from $23.27 million in FY13 to $32.91 million in FY14; and $54.59 million in FY15. Additional funds would be used to increase the per pupil amount to $5000 in FY14 and FY15 and increase the number of children served to over 10,000 in FY15. The number of students currently served is 5,700 children.
-Third Grade Reading Guarantee: The legislature appropriated $13 million in competitive grants to school districts from the Lottery Reserve Fund to support the Third Grade Guarantee Program enacted in SB316 (Lehner) Mid-Biennium Review. Following the discussion with the ODE staff, Kelly Weir, ODE Executive Director of the Office of Legislative Services and Budgetary Planning, presented to the State Board new recommendations for funding the Third Grade Reading Guarantee, totaling $38 million in FY14 and $66.9 million in FY15. The additional funding would be provided in the following areas to support the program:
-Reading Coaches - $15 million for 150 literacy coaches through the School Improvement System
-Professional Development - $10 million to revitalize efforts to build teacher capacity. Within the $10 million, $1 million would be used to create a literacy office with 10 staff at the ODE.
-Reading Grants - $13 million would be continued as grants, but funded out of the General Revenue Fund.
-Teacher Credentials - $18.9 million would be provided to support $1,500 in stipends for teachers to upgrade credentials.
The State Board eventually agreed to reconsider this proposal in October 2012 in order to provide the ODE the opportunity to discuss these ideas with stakeholders and fine-tune the recommendations.
Update on the Report Card Release
The State Board voted on September 12, 2012 to release a spreadsheet with preliminary data results for the 2011-2012 Local Report Cards by September 30, 2012. The spreadsheet will include:
-LEA Name, IRN #, and county of residence
-Performance for all grades and subjects on the Ohio Achievement Assessments and Ohio Graduation Tests
-Adequate Yearly Progress status
-Value-added growth status
The spreadsheet data will not include attendance rates, the Performance Index, the number of indicators met, or an overall rating such as “Excellent” or “Effective.”
The State Board decided to hold the release of the Local Report Card in August 2012 until an investigation about data tampering is completed by State Auditor Dave Yost. The investigation is expected to be completed by January 2013. At that time the State Board will decide whether or not to release a Local Report Card in the traditional format, or release additional information in another spreadsheet.
SBE Sets Third Grade Reading Guarantee Cut Scores
The State Board of Education approved a resolution on September 12, 2012 setting a 390 cut score in 2012-13 and 392 in 2013-14 for the third-grade Ohio Achievement Assessment in English language arts. The cut scores will be used to determine if students in the third grade have achieved the appropriate level in reading in order to be promoted to forth grade reading in accordance with the Third Grade Guarantee (Sec. 3313.608 ORC).
Ohio lawmakers approved the Third Grade Reading Guarantee in SB316 (Lehner) Mid-Biennium Review Education in June 2012. This law emphasizes reading instruction and early-targeted intervention and support in the early grades for students who are not reading on grade level; requires school districts and community schools to diagnose reading deficiencies in students at grades kindergarten through three; requires school districts and community schools to create individualized Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plans; and requires schools to provide intense remediation to students. The law specifies that “intensive, explicit, and systematic instruction” shall be included in the plan (Sec. 3313.608(F) ORC.)
The 390 cut score falls within the basic reading range, while a score of 400 is considered the minimum proficient level. According to Sasheen Phillips, ODE’s Senior Executive Director of the Center for Curriculum and Assessment, an estimated 8,900 students could be retained in reading under the 390 cut score, and 5,700 at the lowest basic score of 385, based on 2010-11 data. The cut scores were set for two years, because starting in 2014-15 schools will be using new assessments developed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) in reading and math aligned to the new Common Core Standards, and the cut scores for limited, basic, proficient, accelerated, and advanced levels will change.
According to Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction Michael Sawyers, most school districts and charter schools (72 percent), have less than 10 students who could be retained based on the score of 390 using 2010-11 data. Most of the students who could be retained attend eleven districts and charter schools in mostly urban areas, such as Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati.
Students who are identified as reading below grade level are required to receive reading intervention services from a teacher who has a reading endorsement. But, according to the ODE, only 4,325 teachers actually have an endorsement in reading in Ohio.
Waivers from Operating Standards
The State Board of Education’s Capacity Committee, Tom Gunlock chair, received information about a new rule being developed by the ODE to waive Operating Standards for public schools upon the request of a board of education. HB153 (Amstutz), the FY12-13 budget bill, requires that “...the State Board adopt standards for the approval or disapproval of waivers from Operating Standards” (Sec. 3301.07(O) ORC). Each waiver granted shall specify the period of time that the waiver is in effect, which shall not exceed five years, and a district board of education may apply to renew a waiver.
There are currently provisions in statute that permit boards of education to seek and be granted waivers from statute, but this rule will be limited to provisions in Operating Standards that are not in statute already. To begin a discussion about developing this rule, a document that identified the following provisions in Operating Standards that are not also in statute was shared with the Capacity Committee.
-The requirement that a school district include the study of foreign languages, technology, family and consumer science, and business education. These content areas are in statute as electives, however.
-Credit flexibility
-The requirement that the ratio of teachers to students district wide be at least one full time equivalent (FTE) classroom teacher to 25 students; the ratio of teachers to students in grades K-4 on a district-wide basis be at least one FTE per 25 students.
-The requirement that five FTE educational service personnel shall be employed for each 1000 students.
-The requirement that every school shall be provided the services of a principal, and every school with fifteen or more full-time equivalent classroom teachers shall be assigned the services of a full-time principal. No principal shall be assigned to more than two schools.
-The requirement that the schedule of a FTE classroom teacher with a teacher day of six hours or longer include 200 minutes per week for designing their work, evaluating student progress, conferencing, and team building.
-The requirement that the school day for students in grades 7-12 be at least five and one-half hours per day. (Statute requires that the day be at least five hours long.)
-The requirement that in addition to its regular budget process, the school district work with stakeholders at least once every three years to evaluate the district’s allocation of educational resources.
A separate list of possible requirements that could be waived for chartered nonpublic schools was also shared with the Capacity Committee.
Updating Operating Standards
The State Board identified reviewing Operating Standards, Administrative Code 3301-35-01 through 07 and 11, as one of its priorities for action during their July 2012 Retreat. The purpose of the review would be to “... assess and propose revisions to the operating standards to determine what updates, if any, should occur to support Ohio’s reform strategy including, but not limited to, providing flexibility to free dollars and seat-time, etc.” (September 2012 Board Book 5 p. 12)
A joint subcommittee of the Achievement and Capacity Committee was appointed by State Board President Terhar to conduct this work. The subcommittee includes Mike Collins, Dannie Greene, Angela Thi Bennett, Tom Gunlock, and C. Todd Jones. The ODE will make a presentation to the full Board about Operating Standards in October 2012. The process will include public hearings at the scheduled State Board meetings (during public participation) and stakeholder participation.
Another subcommittee, which will report to the Achievement Committee, was appointed to address another State Board of Education priority, early childhood education. Other priorities identified at the July SBE Retreat were assigned to the Capacity Committee (school culture), and the Urban Committee (the Third Grade Reading Guarantee and urban education).
State Board of Education Business Meeting on Tuesday, September 11, 2012
The State Board of Education, Debe Terhar president, convened its business meeting on Tuesday, September 11, 2012, and approved minutes for the July 2012 Retreat and August 20, 2012 Special Meeting.
During public participation the State Board received a question from Charlotte Andrist, Central Ohio Branch of the International Dyslexia Association. She requested clarification about the student retention requirement of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee, being discussed by the State Board. She was concerned that the requirement that students receive intense, systematic, and explicit instruction in reading is not included in the Ohio Department of Education’s guidance document about the Third Grade Reading Guarantee. Acting Superintendent Sawyers responded by saying staff would check to ensure that the guidance document reflects the language of the law, and that it was the intent of the ODE to build the capacity of teachers so that they could provide effective interventions.
Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction Michael Sawyers then presented to the Board his report, which noted the following:
•ODE Vacancies: Several vacancies in the ODE are expected to be filled over the next month, including a Senior Executive Director position (replacing Adrian Allison), an Associate Superintendent position (replacing Bill Zelei), and possibly the resurrection of the position of chief of staff.
•OBR to Move to ODE: The Ohio Board of Regents will relocate to the ODE building at 25 South High Street by December 31, 2012. Work to renovate the ODE building will take place starting in September.
•eTPES Launched: The electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems (eTPES) was rolled-out on September 4, 2012 by the ODE. This system allows an evaluator to collect and store evidence and documented observations to determine educator performance based upon defined rubrics, and report educator ratings to ODE. eTPES is based on feedback from the 122 pilot school districts who implemented the system last year. Acting Superintendent Sawyers recognized Lori Lofton, ODE Senior Executive Director, Center for the Teaching Profession; Jim Herrholz, Association Superintendent, Division of Learning; Julia Simmerer, Director Ohio Department of Education, Office of Educator Effectiveness, and Kathy Harper, ODE Office of Equity and Talent, for their contributions to develop and launch eTPES.
•New Assessment System: According to law, the ODE, the State Board of Education, and the Ohio Board of Regents are required to develop a new assessment that includes a college and work ready assessment, end of course exams, and secure vendors to provide the assessments. The new assessment system will replace the Ohio Graduation Tests and will become a prerequisite for students to pass in order to receive a diploma.
The new system will be implemented in 2014-15 and include a national standardized assessment that measures college and career readiness selected jointly by the State Board, the Superintendent, and Chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents. This exam will be administered to students as a planning tool in the 10th grade no later than the fall of the 2014-15 school year. But, in order to accomplish this goal, the exam needs to be available for pilot testing in the fall of next year. Some examples of possible national assessments that are already available include the PSAT (College Board), the PLAN (ACT), the Composite exam (Cisco), etc.
The law also requires the selection of end of course exams by the Superintendent, State Board, and Chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents to replace the Ohio Graduation Test (OGT). These exams are not high stakes exams like the OGT, but the student’s score on the exam will be a percentage of the student’s final grade in the course.
Three of the end of course exams for English language arts will be selected by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC); three of the end of course exams in math, which could be Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 11, or integrated math 1,2,3, will also be selected by PARCC. The remaining exams in American History, American Government, biology, and physical science will be selected by the Superintendent, State Board, and Chancellor.
PARCC is also considering how to incorporate exams required by the International Bachelor and the Advanced Placement programs, so that students participating in these programs do not have to take more assessments.
To facilitate the selection of the new assessments the State Board of Education was presented for approval a memorandum of agreement between the ODE, the State Board of Education, and Chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents. The agreement allows the President of the State Board of Education to act on behalf of the State Board regarding the selection of the new assessments.
Both Rob Hovis and Jeff Hardin expressed concern about the selection of a national exam to assess college and career readiness, and wanted assurances that the special knowledge and skills that students in career tech programs learn are also acknowledged. Acting Superintendent Sawyers responded by saying that representatives from career tech programs will be part of the deliberations about the selection of the national exam.
The State Board then took action on 16 school personnel items and the following resolutions:
#7 Approved a Resolution of Intent to Amend Rule 3301-24-01 of the Administrative Code entitled Glossary/Definitions.
#8 Approved a Resolution of Intent to Amend Rule 3301-24-05 of the Administrative Code entitled Licensure.
#9 Approved a Resolution of Intent to Adopt Birth to Kindergarten Entry Early Learning and Development Standards and their Successors.
#10 Approved a Resolution of Intent to Adopt a Revised Model Anti-Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying (HIB) Policy.
#11 Approved a Resolution to Confirm and Approve the Recommendation of the Hearing Officer and to Approve the Transfer of School District Territory from the Bethel Local School District, Miami County, to the Miami East Local School District, Miami County, pursuant to Section 3311.24 of the Ohio Revised Code.
#12 Approved a Resolution by Substitution to Reject the Hearing Officer’s Report and Approve the Transfer of School District Territory from the Little Miami Local School District, Warren County, to the Kings Local School District, Warren County, pursuant to Section 3311.24 of the Ohio Revised Code. (The original resolution denied the transfer of territory.)
#23 Approved a Resolution to Amend Rule 3301-51-08 of the Administrative Code entitled Parentally Placed Nonpublic School Children.
#24 Approved the Willard City School District Board of Education’s Determination of Impractical Transportation of Certain Students Attending St. Paul Elementary and St. Paul High School in Norwalk, OH.
#25 Approved a Resolution to Adopt the State Board of Education’s 2014-2015 Budget Request to the Governor and Members of the General Assembly. The document includes budget scenarios A, B, and C. Budgets A & B are OBM scenarios that include a budget that is 90 percent of FY13 levels and a budget that is 100 percent of FY13 levels. Document C is the budget document presented to the State Board in June 2012 and includes the funding priorities of the State Board, and place-holders for Foundation Funding levels.
The Resolution was amended to indicate that the State Board will consider at the October 2012 meeting additional funding for the policy areas of early childhood education, the Third Grade Reading Guarantee, Information Technology Infrastructure, and Ohio Young Farmers, and will make additional recommendations to the Office of Budget and Management at that time.
Board member Deb Cain voted against the budget resolution, stating that it does not fulfill the State Board’s responsibility to address school district needs, and does not reflect the severe financial situations that school districts are facing, including the loss of teachers; cuts in AP and arts/music programs; and the number of school districts that are facing ballot issues this year.
#26 Approved a Motion to Select Michael Collins as a voting delegate to the NASBE Convention.
#27 Approved a Resolution to appoint Wayne L. Wlodarski to the Educator Standards Board.
#28 Approved a Resolution to Adopt the Revised Physical Education and Wellness Report Card Measure.
#29 Approved a Resolution to Adopt Cut Scores for the Third Grade Ohio Achievement Assessment in Reading for the Purposes of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee.
#30 Approved a Resolution to Accept the Recommendation of the Hearing Officer and to Revoke the Registration of Rays of Hope as an Autism Scholarship Provider, Pursuant to Section 3310.41 of the Revised Code and Rule 3301-103-06(E) of the Ohio Administrative Code.
#31 Approved a Motion to reconsider #17 and #20, personnel matters. The reconsideration was necessary, because State Board member C. Todd Jones, in his position as a State Board member on the advisory board to review consent agreements, had inadvertently voted on cases that had appeared before him, when he should have abstained. Both resolutions were approved again.
#32 Approved a Motion to release the Local Report Cards as a spreadsheet by September 30, 2012. Rob Hovis moved an amendment to require the State Board to issue the regular Local Report Card, but the amendment failed.
#33 Approved a Motion to appoint Krista Taracuk to the Library Board for a full term.
#34 Approved a Memorandum of Agreement between the ODE, the State Board of Education, and the Chancellor of the Board of Regents, that would allow President Terhar to act on behalf of the State Board of Education in a process to select assessments and end of course exams. The document was amended to indicate that the memorandum would terminate if a joint agreement on the assessments and exams cannot be reached.
#35 Approved a Resolution that directs a committee of the State Board to be created to identify successful educational practices related to financial literacy; determine if the State Board should recommend to the legislature that all students complete a discrete course in financial literacy to graduate; and report its findings and recommendations to the State Board by December 31, 2013.
#36 Presented a Commendation to William Zelei, thanking him for his leadership and work with the Ohio Department of Education.
5) Using NAEP to Predict College and Career Readiness: An article in Education Week on September 11, 2012 entitled “Can NAEP Predict College Readiness” by Sarah D. Sparks, describes the difficulty that educators, researchers, and policy makers have had in using the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores to predict post-high school student achievement in college or careers.
The release of a study that was commissioned by the National Assessment Governing Board to determine the effectiveness of NAEP to predict student preparedness for college, career, and military was delayed last month so that additional data could be collected and analyzed from 2013 NAEP data.
Other researchers have found that the 12th grade NAEP scores in reading and math cover content similar to the SAT. When the NAEP score of proficient is compared to the SAT scores, a proficient score on the NAEP math exam corresponds with an 80 percent chance of earning 500 out of 800 possible points on the math portion of the SAT. A proficient score in reading was associated with a 50-50 chance of scoring 500 on the SAT verbal. 500 is the score that the SAT has established as equivalent to earning at least a B- in freshman level college courses. Researchers have also found that the 12th grade NAEP scores correspond less with the ACT scores than with SAT scores.
According to the article, one of the problems in using NAEP is the lack of a definitive cut score that means that students are college and career ready. According to Cornelia S. Orr, executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board, “The goal for the governing board was to find the point at which students would be prepared academically. As of yet, we haven’t gotten there.”
Using NAEP scores to determine preparation for careers that don’t require four years of college is less likely. College and career ready might not mean the same thing according to Louis M. Fabrizio, a member of the National Assessment Governing Board and director of data, research and policy at the North Carolina Department of Education. A study comparing NAEP scores with career-related WorkKeys tests, for example, found little overlap of content. More research will be conducted next year to compare the skills and knowledge covered in job-training programs in five career areas with the math and reading content in the 12th grade NAEP tests.
The article is available at http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/09/12/03nagb.h32.html.
6) Bills Introduced:
•SB372 (Brown) Summer Meal Programs: Requires school districts to allow alternative summer meal sponsors to use school facilities to provide food service for summer intervention services regardless of financial reasons if at least half of the students are eligible for free lunches.
•HB590 (Boose) Tax Expenditure Review Committee: Creates a Tax Expenditure Review Committee for the purpose of reviewing existing and proposed tax expenditures.
•HCR53 (Goyal) Election Contributions: Memorializes the Congress of the United States to propose an amendment to the United States Constitution to overturn the decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010), and to specify that Congress and the States have the power to regulate contributions and expenditures made for the purpose of influencing elections.
FYI ARTS
1) Nominations Being Accepted for KCAAEN and NSBA Award: The nomination form for the Kennedy Center Alliance for Arts Education Network (KCAAEN) and National School Boards Association Award (NSBA) is available at
https://mail.artsusa.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.kennedy-center.org/SchoolBoardAward
Since 1989, the Kennedy Center Alliance for Arts Education Network and the National School Boards Association have recognized a board of education that has demonstrated support for and commitment to high-quality arts education, and includes all four major artistic disciplines - visual art, music, theater and dance - in their arts education program.
Final selection of a board of education is made by a national panel of educators and arts professionals, including representatives of the KCAAEN and NSBA. The winning school board receives a plaque presented at the NSBA Annual Conference, along with a cash award of $10,000 to use for their arts education program.
One nomination is invited to apply from each U.S. state. The deadline to submit a proposal is December 3, 2012. For more information please contact the Ohio Alliance for Arts Education at http://www.oaae.net/.
A list of past winners can be found online at
https://mail.artsusa.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.kennedy-center.org/education/kcaaen/recognition/nsba_winners.html.
2) The EdTA Conference Video Stream: The Educational Theatre Association will video stream two keynote presentations from the EdTA Conference in San Diego. The two events take place on Saturday, September 22 at 8:45 AM and 11:15 AM Pacific Time. The 8:45 AM web stream will present the results of the Survey of Theatre Education in United States High Schools. The 11:15 AM presentation will discuss the revision of the national arts standards, which EdTA is helping to rewrite, along with many other organizations that belong to the National Coalition for Core Arts Standards. The video stream is available at http://new.livestream.com/edta.
3) Live Webinar about Using the Arts to Transform Struggling Schools: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) Federal Interagency Task Force on the Arts and Human Development will host a live webinar on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 at 2:00 PM EST. The Webinar will focus on the question, “Can the arts play a role in transforming struggling schools and improving student outcomes?”
The webinar will feature presentations by the U.S. Department of Education and The Center for Arts Education in New York City. Representatives from The Center for Arts Education will discuss findings from the U.S. Department of Education Arts in Education Model Development & Dissemination Programs implemented in New York City and Chicago K-8 schools. CAE will also share findings of a study on the impact of arts education on student engagement and graduation in New York City public high schools. Guest speakers include
-Sunil Iyengar, Director of Research & Analysis, NEA, will moderate the webinar
-Jerry Kyle, Management and Program Analyst, Office of Innovation and Improvement, US Department of Education
-Lori Sherman, Director of Development, The Center for Arts Education
-Jerry James, Director of Teaching and Learning, The Center for Arts Education
-Doug Israel, Director of Research and Policy, The Center for Arts Education
-Ramon Gonzalez, Principal, MS223, The Laboratory School of Finance and Technology
This is the latest public webinar hosted by the NEA Interagency Task Force on the Arts and Human Development, an alliance of 14 federal agencies and departments that encourage more and better research on how the arts help people reach their full potential at all stages of life. More information on the Task Force can be found at
https://mail.artsusa.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.nea.gov/research/convenings.html.
This webinar is free and open to the public. No registration is required. To join the webinar, go to
https://mail.artsusa.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://artsgov.adobeconnect.com/artsdev4/
Check the “Enter as Guest” radio button. Type in your name and click hit “Enter Room” to join. Participants can also listen using your computer’s speakers or dial-in to 1-877-685-5350 and use participant code: 942738. Attendees will be muted but able to type in questions and comments through a text Q&A box.
An archive of the webinar will be available on September 24th at https://mail.artsusa.org/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.arts.gov/research/convenings/
4) Reading is Fundamental Adds the Arts: Reading is Fundamental (RIF) released a press release on September 12, 2012 stating that is has launched a multi-year early childhood literacy campaign to integrate the arts with STEM learning. The new RIF program includes a collection of 40 multicultural children’s books and related activities with themes that integrate the arts and STEM subjects.
According to Carol H. Rasco, president and CEO of RIF,
“This initiative is about inspiring the innovators of tomorrow early with engaging books and resources that connect the dots between science, technology and the arts from broad-ranging cultural perspectives. From DaVinci to Madame C.J. Walker to Steve Jobs, our greatest innovators are those who are as creative as they are precise, as imaginative as they are methodical. STEAM-based learning aims to nurture every facet of innovation.”
This year’s collection will be accompanied by a set of free downloadable activities for parents and educators to engage children in literacy development, based on the Common Core Standards adopted by 45 states in the nation. Each book in the collection was carefully reviewed and selected by RIF’s Literacy Services team with guidelines provided by RIF’s Literature Advisory Board and Multicultural Advisory Committee, national panels of educators and experts in books for children.
Reading Is Fundamental is a national non-profit organization which delivers free books to kids and families in under-served communities.
For more information please visit http://www.rif.org/us/about/press-room.htm
5) Target: Field Trip Grants: Target Field Trip Grants are available to fund scholastic outings in situations where monies are otherwise lacking. The maximum award is $700. Teachers, principals, paraprofessionals, and classified staff in K-12 public, are eligible to participate. The deadline to submit a proposal is September 30, 2012. For more information please visit
http://sites.target.com/site/en/company/page.jsp?contentId=WCMP04-031880
Arts On Line Education Update September 4, 2012
OAAE and CPE Host an Information Exchange about School Funding
The Ohio Alliance for Arts Education and the Coalition for Public Education are hosting a public Information Exchange about Ohio's system for funding schools on Saturday, September 29, 2012 from 12:30 - 2:00 PM at the St. Stephen's Community House, 1500 East 17th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43219. The purpose of the non-partisan Information Exchange is to increase financial and public support for traditional public schools by creating a network of well-informed citizens who are willing to contact legislators and policy-makers, and advocate for public schools and a fair and adequate school funding system in the next state budget. To accomplish this goal, the Information Exchange will,
- Inform the public about the current financial status of school districts; efforts to revise the state's school funding system; and efforts to privatize education through vouchers, tuition tax credits, and formulas in which public funds "follow the child".
- Provide an opportunity for the public to ask questions of school funding experts
- Provide an opportunity for small group discussion about the issues to enable the public to express their ideas about a fair state funding system for public schools. (These sessions will be taped in some cases, so that there is a record of the comments for use during next year's budget debate.)
- Facilitate small group discussions so that participants can come to consensus on a message about how schools should be funded.
- Provide opportunities for the public to take action.
Representatives from the Coalition for Public Education, including the Ohio School Boards Association, the Ohio Association of School Business Officials, the Ohio Federation of Teachers, the Ohio Education Association, the Coalition for Equity and Adequacy, and the Buckeye Association of School Administrators, will facilitate the meeting.
Arts education advocates are encouraged to attend and participate in the Information Exchange and,
- Describe the impact of school district budget cuts on the students in schools/districts.
- What arts courses, programs, and grade levels have been cut in your school/district?
- How have these cuts affected sequential learning in the arts and student decisions about continuing education and careers in the arts?
Advocate for the following:
- Ohio's school funding system should provide sufficient financial support to ensure that all students have sequential, standards-based learning opportunities in the arts (defined as dance, drama theatre, music, visual art, and media arts) in grades K-12, so that by the end of 12th grade all students have
- experienced the fine arts: dance, drama/theater, music, and visual art
- studied at least one art form in depth
- graduated with at least one high school credit in the arts, and
- are prepared with the knowledge and skills to pursue a career in the arts or higher education in the arts, if that is their choice.
(These expectations are listed on p.2 of the Academic Content Standards for the Fine Arts, adopted by the State Board of Education in December 2003.)
The public is invited to attend this meeting, but space is limited. Please RSVP to jhallett@oaae.net or call 614.224.1060 to reserve your seat.
The Coalition for Public Education (CPE) was formed in 2001 to challenge the constitutionality of the state's charter school statutes. (Ohio Congress of Parents Teachers, et. al. v State Board of Education, et. al.,) Since that time the CPE has promoted public education and public schools by recognizing innovative student programs in traditional public school districts during the OSBA Capital Conference, Student Achievement Fair; testifying before the State Board of Education and the Ohio General Assembly in support of legislation and rules to increase accountability for charter schools; and providing an analysis of charter school report card data each year.
Members of the CPE include the Ohio Congress of Parents and Teachers, the League of Women Voters of Ohio, the Ohio Association of School Business Officials, the Ohio Federation of Teachers, the Ohio Education Association, the Coalition for Equity and Adequacy, the Buckeye Association of School Administrators, and several local teachers' unions.
House and Senate Preparing for Passage of Pension Reform Bills
The House Health and Aging Subcommittee on Retirement and Pensions has agreed to substitute bills on reforming Ohio’s public employee pension systems. The subcommittee intends to approve the substitute bills on September 10; with full committee approval expected later that day, and a House and Senate vote scheduled for September 11 or 12.
Since the Ohio Retirement Study Council heard a presentation from outside consultants on July 11, the House Health and Aging Subcommittee on Retirement and Pensions has been conducting weekly hearings on pension reform legislation passed by the Senate. The consultants — Pension Trustee Advisers (PTA) and KMS Actuaries — were hired to review the pension reform plans proposed by Ohio’s five public pension systems.
The subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Kirk Schuring (R-Canton) met weekly at the Statehouse through the month of August and into September.
The STRS plan, which is incorporated in SB 342, has passed the Senate, and is one of the bills being considered in the House Health and Aging Subcommittee on Retirement and Pensions. Key elements of SB 342 include:
Contributions
Beginning July 1, 2013, increases the employee contribution rate, which is paid by STRS members, by increments to 14% (from 10%) of compensation.
For compensation earned on or after July 1, 2017, permits the STRS Board to reduce the employee contribution rate to less than 14% if the Board's actuary determines that a reduction in the rate does not materially impair the fiscal integrity of the retirement system.
Retirement eligibility and formulas
Eligibility
Beginning August 1, 2015, changes eligibility requirements for unreduced retirement benefits for STRS members but retains the current provision under which a member may retire with an unreduced benefit at age 65 with a minimum of five years of service credit, except that under the bill the credit must be "qualifying" service credit.
Beginning August 1, 2015, changes eligibility requirements for retirement benefits for STRS members who elect to retire early and receive a reduced benefit but retains the current provision under which a member may retire with a reduced benefit at age 60 with a minimum of five years of service credit, except that under the bill the credit must be "qualifying" service credit.
Permits the STRS Board to adjust retirement eligibility requirements if the Board's actuary determines that an adjustment does not materially impair the fiscal integrity of the retirement system or is necessary to preserve the fiscal integrity of the system.
For retirement effective on or after August 1, 2015, reduces the rate used to calculate benefits to 2.2% of final average salary (FAS) for each year of service credit beyond 30 years, rather than 2.5% plus an amount increasing by .1% of FAS for each year beyond 30.
For benefits beginning on or after August 1, 2015, changes to five (from three) the number of years used to determine final average salary (FAS), which is used to calculate a retirement allowance or disability benefit.
Permits an STRS member who under current law on July 1, 2015 would be eligible to retire, to retire on or after August 1, 2015 and receive the greater of the benefit determined under the current benefit formula or the new benefit formula established by the bill.
Effective July 1, 2013, eliminates the commuted service calculation, which is an alternative to the final average salary method of calculating a retirement allowance. Effective July 1, 2013, eliminates the $86 minimum benefit calculation in the final average salary formula.
Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)
Effective August 1, 2013, reduces the COLA to an annual 2% (from 3%), except that no COLA's will be granted from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014, to persons retiring prior to July 1, 2013, or until July 1, 2015, to persons retiring on or after July 1, 2013.
Authorizes the STRS Board to adjust the COLA if the Board's actuary determines, in its annual actuarial valuation or in other evaluations, that an adjustment does not materially impair the fiscal integrity of the retirement system or is necessary to preserve the fiscal integrity of the system.
For those receiving an allowance or benefit beginning on or after August 1, 2013, increases to five years (from one year) the time that must pass before the first COLA is granted unless the allowance or benefit was immediately preceded by a disability benefit that was terminated because the recipient reached retirement age.
Provides that the retirement allowance of an STRS member whose disability benefit terminates and is immediately replaced by a retirement allowance will be increased by any COLAs granted while the member was receiving the disability benefit and specifies that the increase is based on the plan of payment selected by the member.
States the General Assembly's intent in enacting modifications to COLAs.
Health care
Creates a health care fund, to which amounts allocated by the STRS Board for health care and any earnings are to be credited.
Provides that, if STRS discontinues health care coverage, any remaining surplus funds are to be distributed to employers who have contributed to the health care
fund.
Permits, rather than requires, the STRS Board to reimburse Medicare Part B premiums to benefit recipients and provides that reimbursement may be made only to recipients who are "enrolled in" (rather than "eligible for") Medicare Part B.
Limits the monthly Medicare Part B premium reimbursement to an amount determined by the STRS Board that is not to exceed 90% of the basic premium, except that the reimbursement cannot exceed the amount actually paid for coverage.
Provides that STRS is permitted, rather than required, to offer long-term care coverage.
Amendments expected in the substitute bill
- Requirement of the Ohio Retirement Study Council (ORSC) to :
1)Study and make recommendations on the authority the bill gives the State Teaches Retirement System (STRS) to:
-Reduce the employee contribution rate to less than 14% for compensation earned after July 1, 2017;
-Adjust retirement eligibility requirements;
-Adjust the cost-of-living adjustment.
2) Within 90 days after the bill’s effective date, prepare and submit to the Senate President and House Speaker a report of its findings and recommendations.
- Changes the effective date of the bill to January 7, 2013.
- Delays for an additional 180 days provisions authorizing the STRS Board to:
- 1)Reduces the employee contribution rate to less than 14% for compensation earned on or after July 1, 2017;
- 2)Adjust retirement eligibility requirements;
- 3)Adjust the cost-of-living adjustment.
- Delays until July 31, 2014, the repeal of a provision providing for the establishment of retirement incentive plans.
- Delays the effective date of the following provision until July 1, 2014: Provides that an STRS member may retire from one or more positions covered by STRS or other state retirement systems and continue contributing to STRS or other state retirement systems only if the member continuously held the positions for which the member continues to contribute for 12 consecutive months immediately prior to retirement
To view the bill analysis of Sub. SB 382 go to: http://www.lsc.state.oh.us/bills
School-funding hearings
The House Extended Subcommittee on Primary and Secondary Education hosted several hearings on school funding in July. The committee is using a website that includes the schedule for hearings, testimony presented and other useful information. To view the website, go to studentlearningfirst.ohiohouse.gov.
Note: The information contained in this update was submitted on September 7, 2012.
Ohio Alliance for Arts Education
September 10, 2012
Joan Platz
Arts On Line Education Update
How will your school/district celebrate Arts in Education Week, September 9-15, 2012?
Governor Kasich and Lieutenant Governor Mary Taylor have issued a Proclamation declaring the week of September 9-15, 2012 Arts in Education Week. The Proclamation encourages support for the arts as a core academic subject and as an essential component of a complete and balanced education for all students.
The Ohio Alliance for Arts Education is pleased to announce that supporting the Proclamation are all the major education and arts education organizations in Ohio, including the State Board of Education, the Ohio Department of Education, the Ohio Music Education Association, the Buckeye Association of School Administrators, the Ohio Art Education Association, the Ohio Association of Elementary School Administrators, the Ohio Association for Gifted Children, the Ohio Association of School Business Officials, the Ohio Association of Secondary School Administrators, the Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy of School Funding, OhioDance, the Ohio Education Association, the Ohio Educational Service Center Association, the Ohio Educational Theatre Association, the Ohio Federation of Teachers, the Ohio Congress of Parents and Teachers, the Ohio School Boards Association, and the Ohio School Psychologists Association.
Some of the ways to promote Arts in Education Week include
•Write a letter to the editor for the local newspaper highlighting the significant impact arts education has on students and your community.
•Present at a board of education meeting, and highlight the contributions that arts education programs have made to students, the school district, and the community. Present a copy of the Proclamation to your local board of education and request that they endorse it.
•Ask businesses in your community to display the Proclamation in their windows or information bulletin boards, and encourage them to support the arts in schools.
•Encourage teachers and school administrators to incorporate Arts in Education Week in school activities the week of September 9th. For example, request that an announcement about Arts in Education Week be made prior to the marching band’s halftime show at the football game, and request that information about Arts in Education Week be included on the school/district website, in school announcements, in school newsletters, and on information boards.
•Write to elected officials (school board members, city council, Ohio House and Senate members, etc.) requesting that they support an adequate, fair, and stable school funding system that includes sufficient resources to provide quality arts education programs for all students.
•Invite artists in your community to speak to students about being college and career ready in the arts.
Americans for the Arts will be celebrating Arts in Education Week by hosting a blog salon on ARTSblog. This is a biannual event about arts education topics, and this fall’s theme is the intersection of the arts and the new Common Core State Standards. The blog salon will feature a collection of posts by arts and education leaders, such as Yong Zhao, Richard Kessler, and Amy Johnson. Follow the salon by using the arts education tag on ARTSblog http://blog.artsusa.org/category/arts-education/.
Let the OAAE know how you celebrate Arts in Education Week so that we can share your ideas!
To view a copy of the Arts in Education Week Proclamation, please visit http://oaae.net.
1) 129th Ohio General Assembly: The Ohio House and Senate are scheduled to meet on September 12, 2012 to consider five pension reform bills:
-SB340 (Niehaus) Ohio Police and Fire Pension Funding
-SB341 (Niehaus) School Employees Retirement System
-SB342 (Niehaus) State Teachers Retirement System
-SB343 (Niehaus) Public Employees Retirement System
-SB345 (Niehaus/Kearney) State Highway Patrol Retirement System
On September 5, 2012 the House Health and Aging Retirement and Pensions Subcommittee, chaired by Representative Schuring accepted substitute versions of the bills. The subcommittee is scheduled to meet on September 10, 2012 at 11:00 AM in hearing room 121 and approve the bills, setting up a vote on the bills by the full House Health and Aging Committee, chaired by Representative Wachtmann, on September 10, 2012 at 3:00 PM. The bills will then be considered by the Ohio House and Senate.
2) 2012 Election News:
•Early Voting Update: The U.S. District Court Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division ordered on August 31, 2012 Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted to restore in-person early voting on the weekend before the November 6, 2012 election. (Obama for America v. Husted)
Last week Secretary Husted issued an order barring county boards of elections from posting in-person voting hours on the weekend before the November 6, 2012 election, pending a decision in an appeal of the ruling. The appeal was filed by Attorney General Mike DeWine with the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 4, 2012. By the end of last week, however, Secretary Husted had rescinded that order after U.S. District Court Judge Peter Economus requested that Secretary Husted appear before the Court to explain why he issued an order that contradicted the ruling. Secretary Husted also filed a motion for a stay of the order. For information about this ruling, please visit http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/.
•Update on the Provisional Ballot Ruling: On September 6, 2012 Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine appealed a ruling issued last week by U.S. District Court Judge Algenon Marbley. The ruling ordered Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted to issue a directive within ten days requiring boards of elections to count provisional ballots that are miscast due to poll worker error or technical mistakes. The appeal was made to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Service Employees International Union v. Husted and Northeast Ohio Coalition of the Homeless v. Husted). For more information please visit http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/.
3) State Board of Education to Meet
The State Board of Education, Debe Terhar president, will meet on September 10-11, 2012 at the Ohio School for the Deaf, 500 Morse Road, Columbus, OH.
Meeting on Monday, September 10, 2012
The Legislative and Budget Committee, chaired by C. Todd Jones will meet at 8:30 AM to discuss the State Board of Education’s FY14-15 Budget and Legislative Recommendations.
The Executive Committee, chaired by Debe Terhar, will meet at 9:30 AM and discuss the superintendent’s search; discuss the State Board’s Policy and Procedures Manual; and select a voting delegate to the NASBE convention.
At 10:00 AM the full Board will discuss changes to the 2011-2012 Local Report Card and the July Retreat.
Following lunch at 1:00 PM the full Board will receive a presentation regarding the FY14-15 State Board of Education Budget and Legislative Recommendations.
The State Board will convene its business meeting at 3:30 PM and move into Executive Session. Following the Executive Session the Achievement, Capacity, and Urban Education committees will meet.
The Achievement Committee, chaired by Angela Thi Bennett, will discuss and approve a Resolution to Adopt a Revised Physical Education and Wellness Report Card Measure; discuss and approve a Resolution of Intent to Adopt Early Learning and Development Standards; discuss proposed amendments to assessment rules and approve a Resolution for Assessments; and discuss the Restraint and Seclusion Policy.
The Capacity Committee, chaired by Tom Gunlock, will discuss standards for Waivers of the Operating Standards pursuant to R.C. 3301.07(O); discuss an update on ORC 3319.228(B)(1) List of States with Inadequate Licensure Standards; and discuss OAC Rule 3301-24-05 Licensure.
The Committee on Urban Education, chaired by Joe Farmer, will discuss planning for future meetings and activities.
Meeting on Tuesday, September 11, 2012
The State Board will continue its meeting on September 11, 2012 at 8:30 AM with a policy review of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee and an overview of setting cut scores for the reading guarantee. The business meeting will follow. The State Board will approve minutes for the July 2012 Retreat and August 20, 2012 Special Meeting; receive public participation on agenda items; receive the report of the Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction; vote on the Report and the Recommendations of the Acting Superintendent of Public Instruction; consider old business and new business; receive public participation on non-agenda items at 1:00 PM; and adjourn.
The following is the Report and Recommendations of the Superintendent of Public Instruction:
#7 Approve a Resolution of Intent to Amend Rule 3301-24-01 of the Administrative Code entitled Glossary/Definitions.
#8 Approve a Resolution of Intent to Amend Rule 3301-24-05 of the Administrative Code entitled Licensure.
#9 Approve a Resolution of Intent to Adopt Birth to Kindergarten Entry Early Learning and Development Standards and their Successors.
#10 Approve a Resolution of Intent to Adopt a Revised Model Anti-Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying (HIB) Policy.
#11 Approve a Resolution to Confirm and Approve the Recommendation of the Hearing Officer and to Approve the Transfer of School District Territory from the Bethel Local School District, Miami County, to the Miami East Local School District, Miami County, pursuant to Section 3311.24 of the Ohio Revised Code.
#12 Approve a Resolution to Confirm and Approve the Recommendation of the Hearing Officer and to Deny the Transfer of School District Territory from the Little Miami Local School District, Warren County, to the Kings Local School District, Warren County, pursuant to Section 3311.24 of the Ohio Revised Code.
#23 Approve a Resolution to Amend Rule 3301-51-08 of the Administrative Code entitled Parentally Placed Nonpublic School Children.
#24 Approve the Willard City School District Board of Education’s Determination of Impractical Transportation of Certain Students Attending St. Paul Elementary and St. Paul High School in Norwalk, OH.
#25 Approve a Resolution to Adopt the State Board of Education’s 2014-2015 Budget Request to the Governor and Members of the General Assembly.
#26 Approve a Motion to Select a State Board of Education Voting Delegate at the NASBE Convention.
#27 Approve a Resolution of Appointment to the Educator Standards Board.
#28 Approve a Resolution to Adopt the Revised Physical Education and Wellness Report Card Measure.
#29 Approve a Resolution to Adopt Cut Scores for the Third Grade Ohio Achievement Assessment in Reading for the Purposes of the Third Grade Reading Guarantee.
#30 Approve a Resolution to Accept the Recommendation of the Hearing Officer and to Revoke the Registration of Rays of Hope as an Autism Scholarship Provider, Pursuant to Section 3310.41 of the Revised Code and Rule 3301-103-06(E) of the Ohio Administrative Code.
4) Republican Platform for Education: The following is a summary of the 2012 Republican Party platform for education. In order to analyze the platform the summary is organized into several capitalized topics, which are not part of the original document.
Republican Platform: Education: A Chance for Every Child
CHOICE
The Platform strongly supports consumer rights in education choice and states that it is “...the most important driving force for renewing our schools.”
The Platform supports, “School choice—whether through charter schools, open enrollment requests, college lab schools, virtual schools, career and technical education programs, vouchers, or tax credits—is important for all children, especially for families with children trapped in failing schools.”
The Platform also supports an expansion of the “D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program” nationwide.
PARENT INVOLVEMENT
The Platform states that parents are responsible for the education of their children. Parents should be provided broad education choices at the state and local levels. There should be transparency so that “...parents and the public can discover which schools best serve their pupils”.
CURRICULUM
The Platform supports “...family literacy programs, which improve the reading, language, and life skills of both parents and children from low-income families”.
It also supports an “English First approach” and opposes divisive programs that limit “students’ ability to advance in American society.”
According to the Platform, higher expectations for all students and higher academic standards are needed. The types of educational programs that should be provided include “... the development of character and financial literacy; periodic rigorous assessments on the fundamentals, especially math, science, reading, history, and geography; renewed focus on the Constitution and the writings of the Founding Fathers, and an accurate account of American history that celebrates the birth of this great nation”.
The Platform supports replacing “family planning” programs for teens with “...abstinence education which teaches abstinence until marriage as the responsible and respected standard of behavior.”
The Platform opposes “school-based clinics that provide referrals, counseling, and related services for abortion and contraception”, and the use of federal money “..in mandatory or universal mental health, psychiatric, or socio-emotional screening programs.
GOVERNANCE
The Platform mentions that schools need “strong leadership from locally elected school boards” and supports state and local control of schools.
FUNDING
According to the Platform, “More money alone does not necessarily equal better performance.” The Platform supports “...block grants and the repeal of numerous federal regulations which interfere with State and local control of public schools. The bulk of the federal money through Title I for low-income children and through IDEA for disabled youngsters should follow the students to whatever school they choose so that eligible pupils, through open enrollment, can bring their share of the funding with them.”
ACCOUNTABILITY
The Platform supports accountability on the part of “...administrators, parents and teachers.”
EDUCATION REFORM
According to the Platform, schools should be provided the flexibility and freedom to innovate and adapt to the special needs of their students. Teachers and administrators are responsible for student performance.
The Platform supports policies and methods that have proven effective such as, “...building on the basics, especially STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, and math) and phonics; ending social promotions; merit pay for good teachers; classroom discipline; parental involvement; and strong leadership by principals, superintendents, and locally elected school boards” and the proper implementation of technology.
Other types of reforms that are supported include “home schooling and local innovations like single-sex classes, full-day school hours, and year-round schools.”
CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION
The platform supports “...the promotion of local career and technical educational programs and entrepreneurial programs that have been supported by leaders in industry and will retrain and retool the American workforce, which is the best in the world.”
TEACHERS
The Platform states that, “We applaud America’s great teachers, who should be protected against frivolous litigation and should be able to take reasonable actions to maintain discipline and order in the classroom.”
Legislation should be passed to correct the current law defining a “Highly Qualified Teacher” by credentials, rather than results in the classroom. School districts should be able “...to make use of teaching talent in business, STEM fields, and in the military, especially among our returning veterans. Rigid tenure systems based on the “last in, first out” policy should be replaced with a merit-based approach that can attract fresh talent and dedication to the classroom.”
All personnel who interact with school children should pass background checks and be held to the highest standards of personal conduct.
HIGHER EDUCATION
According to the Platform, “Higher education faces its own challenges, many of which stem from the poor preparation of students before they reach college. One consequence has been the multiplying number of remedial courses for freshmen.”
The Platform calls on State officials to “...ensure that our public colleges and universities be places of learning and the exchange of ideas, not zones of intellectual intolerance favoring the Left.”
“New systems of learning are needed to compete with traditional four-year colleges: expanded community colleges and technical institutions, private training schools, online universities, life-long learning, and work-based learning in the private sector.”
According to the Platform, Federal student aid is on an un-sustainable path. “The federal government should not be in the business of originating student loans; however, it should serve as an insurance guarantor for the private sector as they offer loans to students. Private sector participation in student financing should be welcomed. Any regulation that drives tuition costs higher must be reevaluated to balance its worth against its negative impact on students and their parents.”
Source: 2012 Republican Party Platform pp. 35-37. http://www.gop.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/2012GOPPlatform.pdf
5) Democratic Party Platform for Education
The following is a summary of the 2012 Democratic Party platform for education. In order to analyze the platform the summary is organized into several capitalized topics, which are not part of the original document.
Democratic Platform: An Economy that Out-Educates the World and Offers Greater Access to Higher Education and Technical Training.
PUBLIC EDUCATION
The Democratic Platform believes that public education “...is one of our critical democratic institutions” and is committed to ensuring that every child in America has access to a world-class public education. The goal is for the United States to have the world’s highest proportion of college graduates by 2020.
EARLY LEARNING
The Platform identifies the public education system as extending from early learning through post-secondary education. Standards for early learning should be improved, and Head Start extended.
PARENT INVOLVEMENT
The Platform states “We also recognize there is no substitute for a parent’s involvement in their child’s education.”
CHOICE
The Platform supports public school options including magnet schools, charter schools, teacher-led schools, and career academies.
CURRICULUM
According to the Platform all students should have access to high quality opportunities including those in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, etc. The Platform also states that Democrats are proud of their support for arts funding and education, and are committed to continuing the policies and programs that support the creative arts industry and economy. According to the Platform, “Investment in the arts strengthens our communities and contributes to our nation’s rich cultural heritage.” Support will continue for the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and for programs providing art and music education in primary and secondary schools.
FUNDING
The Platform states that schools need flexibility and resources to improve elementary and secondary education in a way that works best for students.
EDUCATION REFORM
The Platform supports closing the achievement gap in America’s schools; raising standards so that all students graduate ready for college or careers; turning around low performing schools; and providing public school options for students who are potential dropouts.
TEACHERS
According to the Platform, “...Democrats honor our nation’s teachers, who do a heroic job for their students every day. If we want high-quality education for all our kids, we must listen to the people who are on the front lines.”
The Platform notes how the Obama administration has worked to save teaching jobs through the stimulus package, and has worked to prevent more teacher layoffs while attracting and rewarding great teachers.
The Democratic Party supports raising standards for the programs that prepare teachers; recognizing and rewarding good teaching; retaining good teachers; evaluating teachers; giving struggling teachers a chance to succeed; and protecting due process.
Democrats are committed to preparing math and science teachers and training workers with skills for the future, and doubling funding for key basic research agencies.
HIGHER EDUCATION
The Platform supports reforming the student loan program, by removing the banks acting as middlemen, and direct investments to more students; making college affordable for students by doubling Pell Grant scholarships and creating the American Opportunity Tax Credit worth up to $10,000 over four years of college; creating avenues for students to manage their federal student loans; encouraging colleges to keep their costs down; investing in colleges that keep tuition affordable and provide good value; doubling the number of work-study jobs available to students; continuing to ensure that students have access to federal loans with reasonable interest rates; and investing in Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Tribal Colleges and Universities, Alaska, Hawaiian Native Institutions, Asian American and Pacific Islander Institutions, and other Minority Serving Institutions.
The Platform supports investing in community colleges and supporting additional partnerships between businesses and community colleges to train workers, and investing in science to educate the next generation of scientists and engineers.
According to the Platform “...we will work to make it possible for foreign students earning advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to stay and help create jobs here at home” and allow “deserving young people, who are American in every way but on paper” stay and complete their education.
The Democratic Platform is available at http://assets.dstatic.org/dnc-platform/2012-National-Platform.pdf
6) State Funding for Education Drops: The Center on Budget Policies and Priorities released on September 4, 2012 an analysis of state budget documents for funding primary and secondary education programs in 48 states. (“New School Year Brings More Cuts in State Funding for Schools” by Phil Oliff, Chris Mai, and Michael Leachman, The Center on Budget Policies and Priorities, September 4, 2012.)
According to the analysis, states have made deep cuts in education funding since the start of the recession and those cuts have increased over the last year. “Elementary and high schools are receiving less state funding in the 2012-13 school year than they did last year in 26 states, and in 35 states school funding now stands below 2008 levels — often far below.”
The analysis found that state revenues began to drop in 2007 to the lowest levels in the past 70 years. To balance budgets most states relied on spending cuts rather than a balanced approach using cuts and revenue increases. This strategy led to severe cuts for education programs and local governments.
Currently state funding for schools remains well below pre-recession levels. For example, seventeen states have cut per-student funding by more than 10 percent from 2008 levels. Arizona, Alabama, and Oklahoma have reduced per-pupil funding to K-12 schools by more than 20 percent. The state level of funding in Ohio dropped $152 per student in 2012.
Although the economies of some states are recovering, the report states that “...it will take years before state revenues are able to sustain services like K-12 education at normal levels.” For example, Florida cut the state’s per pupil funding level by $569 over the previous four years, and has only been able to increase per pupil allocations by $273 in 2012.
The analysis did find some states in which education funding increased or remained the same between 2008-2012. Alaska, Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming have significant oil and gas resources, and did not experience the recession like other states. Maryland, Massachusetts, and Iowa maintained state spending levels for education as a policy decision.
The report also notes the consequences of the steep K-12 spending cuts. School districts with higher concentrations of poverty depend more on state education aid, and lost more state funding when state spending cuts were made.
The spending cuts extended the recession and slowed the recovery, because schools laid-off teachers and administrators, according to federal employment data. The report states, “As of July 2012, local school districts had cut 328,000 jobs nationally compared to 2008.” The job losses have affected the purchasing power of families, thus extending the recession.
The cuts in state spending for education also affected education reform initiatives, such as lengthening the school day; reducing class size; expanding early childhood education; expanding worker training programs, etc.
According to the report, deeper cuts in federal funds for education known as “sequestration” will go into effect if the U.S. Congress and president are not able to agree on a path to reduce the federal budget and lower deficits by January 2013. If sequestration happens state economic conditions will become worse, making it harder for states to restore funding for education.
The report is available at http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3825
7) Blog Explores the Movement to Privatize Education: Anthony Cody in Education Week’s “Living in the Dialog Blog” writes that the battle lines over education reform have become hardened over the role of the marketplace in pushing forward education improvement and innovation. (The Dialog with the Gates Foundation: What Happens When Profits Drive Reform” by Anthony Cody, Education Week, September 3, 2012.)
This is the last blog in a series of dialogues that Mr. Cody has had with Gates Foundation associates discussing the purpose of K-12 education; how poverty affects student learning; teacher evaluations; etc.
In this blog Mr. Cody provides a history of a movement that he believes is underway to undermine public education in order to promote privately run and often for-profit school alternatives, such as charter schools, virtual schools, vouchers, and the for-profit industry that provides support services for K-12 education, valued at $1.3 trillion. Some of the participants in movement include the leaders of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Pearson Foundation (Connections Education), the American Legislative Exchange Council, K12, Inc., Cities for Education Entrepreneurship Trust, and groups and businesses led by Rupert Murdoch, Jeb Bush (Foundation for Excellence in Education), and Michelle Rhee to name a few.
According to the author, advocates for privatization have pushed for federal legislation such as the No Child Left Behind Act and Race to the Top, and statewide support for the Common Standards, teacher evaluations based on student test scores, and merit-based teacher compensation. State initiatives to test all students, rate schools based on student performance, and collect and disseminate student data are being used to undermine the public confidence in public schools, in order to open the door for “non-government” alternative educational options, such as charter schools and voucher programs.
The author writes, “From my perspective, the drive for profits is problematic as a motive force for school reform. As we see with the virtual charter sector, there are great incentives to create “efficiencies,” and, lacking significant oversight, there are huge problems with quality. The collusion between the profiteering virtual charters, the testing industry, ALEC and the legislative bodies that are being influenced through legalized bribery taints the entire project.”
He describes the role of the Gates Foundation in this movement as “seminal”. The Gates Foundation gave $2 million to publicize the film “Waiting for Superman”; funds Excellence in Education and the Parent Revolution, an organization that supports parent trigger laws, and Media Bullpen, which rates the media based on its support for vouchers and charters.
The author also notes that the Gates Foundation has supported many education efforts not related to privatizing education, but its emphasis on the Common Core; online testing; standardized testing; evaluating teachers based on student test scores is clearly a priority for the foundation.
The author concludes that the purpose of public education is to ensure that all students, not just the lucky few, have access to excellent educational opportunities. Public schools exist “not only to provide opportunity for individual students, but also as a common resource, in which we invest as community members. We bring together children from all races, religions and walks of life under one roof, to learn together.”
The blog is available at http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2012/09/the_dialogue_with_the_gates_fo.html?cmp=ENL-EU-VIEWS2
FYI ARTS
1) Update from the Ohio Arts Council (OAC): The September/October 2012 issue of ArtsOhio is available at http://maildogmanager.com/page.html?p=000001XDDtjAo7FbgWdmA0xKImtLCZi84GaPpqVTnDs+Sy.
This issue includes information about how to nominate an individual or organization for the 2013 Governor’s Awards for the Arts in Ohio; information about how to register for Poetry Out Loud; a calendar of arts events in Ohio for September and October; and information about October, which is National Arts and Humanities Month.
October has been recognized as National Arts and Humanities Month (NAHM) since 1993 and many Ohio communities will celebrate NAHM with special events and activities.
The Ohio Arts Council will host several events to celebrate NAHM including performing, literary, and visual arts activities at the Statehouse and the Ohio Arts Council’s Riffe Gallery.
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 at noon the public is invited to readings by notable Ohio poets and a Poetry Out Loud finalist.
Every Wednesday during October from noon to 1:00 PM visitors to the Statehouse can enjoy a special Art Tour highlighting the People’s Art Collection. The tour includes the governors portrait collection, the artwork in the rotunda, and other paintings and sculptures throughout the Capitol Square complex. Leslie Adams, portrait artist and painter, will talk about her portraits of Governors Bob Taft and Ted Strickland on October 24, 2012 at noon.
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 at noon, Inlet Dance Theatre, one of Ohio’s most exciting contemporary dance companies, will perform. Inlet also conducts artist residencies across the state through our Arts Learning Artist in Residence program.
To find other NAHM events in Ohio please visit ArtsinOhio.com.
2) September 2012 Kennedy Center Update: The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts September 2012 Update includes information about professional development opportunities for arts educators; updates about Any Given Child and other Kennedy Center programs; information about Kennedy Center partners, including the Ohio Alliance for Arts Education; and information about grant opportunities.
The following is information included in this issue of the September Update. For more information please visit http://www.kennedy-center.org/education/nationalpartnerships/newsletter.html.
-The National Endowment for the Arts’ Office of Research & Analysis recently announced that application guidelines are now available for funding through Research: ArtWorks. This program supports research that investigates the value of the U.S. arts ecosystem and the impact of the arts on other domains of American life. The NEA anticipates awarding up to 25 grants in the range of $10,000 to $30,000. The deadline for application submission is November 6, 2012 for projects that can begin as early as May 1, 2013. For information please visit http://arts.gov/grants/apply/Research/index.html.
-Grants for teachers of children who learn differently are available from the P. Buckley Moss Foundation. These education grants support projects that integrate the arts into educational programming and support teachers who wish to establish an effective learning tool using the arts in teaching children with learning disabilities and other special needs. Educators may apply for grants of up to $1,000 to support a new or evolving project. The application deadline is September 30, 2012. Applications are available at http://mossfoundation.org/national-educators-awards-and-grants.
-The September Update also provides information about the recent grants awarded to train arts educators in high poverty schools. The U.S. Department of Education announced the award of more than $1.2 million in grants to school districts in California, Florida, Nevada, and New York under the Arts in Education-Professional Development for Arts Educators program. The funds will support high-quality training programs in elementary and secondary education for music, dance, drama, media arts, or visual arts. The grants are targeted for schools with students from low-income households. For more information please visit http://www2.ed.gov/programs/artsedprofdev/index.html.
FROM: Ann Brennan
FYI: The following excerpt from Gongwer regarding the Actuarial report on the Ohio public employee retirement systems. The House may meet later this summer to move the Senate passed bills.
"Ohio's pension system structure is solid, but legislative efforts to enact system-approved restructuring plans should be enacted this year to improve financial stability, according to an independent report produced for the Ohio Retirement Study Council.
The report by Pension Trustee Advisors/KMS Actuaries supports keeping defined benefit plans for public workers, but also offers other options for future consideration.
The report, which will be discussed at an ORSC meeting Wednesday, is expected to guide the House's consideration of Senate-approved bills (SB 340, SB 341
, SB 342
, SB 343
& SB 345
) that would revamp the financial structure of Ohio's five public employee retirement systems.
Speaker Bill Batchelder (R-Medina) delayed action on the measures pending the finalization of the report, which refers to the legislation that's based mostly on the boards' own recommendations.
The study says adjustments beyond those included in the Senate-passed bills may be needed for four of the five systems because of lower-than-expected investment returns since the board plans were adopted.
Among other things, the document calls for:
-
Actuarially funding health care benefits
-
Adding a mechanism to allow structural changes based on unexpected actuarial experience.
-
Maintenance of efforts to eliminate inefficiencies in current plan design that could lead to unexpected costs and a perception of unreasonable benefits.
-
Systems to continue to monitor and modify health benefits as necessary.
Referencing the unpredictable nature of investment returns, the study also calls for an "immediate and disciplined" process through which system changes could be made more quickly - likely outside of the legislative arena.
"This mechanism at the very least should include limited pension system board discretion to adjust benefits or contributions as included in several of the Senate bills," it says. "A more rigorous alternative would be a flexible Cost-of-Living-Adjustment based on funded position."
PTA/KMS also said the proposals set forth by the State Teachers Retirement System, School Employees Retirement System, Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund and Highway Patrol Retirement System may need additional adjustments given lower-than-expected returns since their plans were finalized.
"To avoid likely frequent future benefit changes, consideration should be given to providing greater cuts than currently needed to provide a margin for future adverse experience," authors said. "Alternatively, future favorable experience could be 'reserved' for the same purpose."
The report also said it "strongly" encourages lawmakers to enact changes this year. "Whether these plans are accepted, modified slightly, or another approach is taken, the systems are correct that delay creates additional cost," authors said. "Ohio seems ripe for meaningful pension reform; the systems have made difficult decisions as to potential change; and this study provides an independent confirmation of the strength of the plans. Even if additional changes are required or desired based on the alternatives discussed in this report, the changes proposed now are appropriate and significant. We see no valid reason for delay."
The report also praised Ohio's limits on employer contributions. "Very few pension systems in the U.S. have this rigor in shifting the risk of unfavorable experience to the employees in the form of potentially reduced future retirement or health care benefits and/or increases in employee contributions," it states. "This mechanism utilizes the efficiencies of defined benefit plans without the risk of a blank check to the employers."
The PTA/KMS study urges each system to develop practices through which they can adapt to investment changes. "These are challenging decisions that demand prudent and active policy development and should include consideration of reserves established in the good times to absorb some or all of the unfavorable experience in the bad times that may avoid or lessen the need for benefit reductions. ORSC can assist the systems in developing guidelines for this decision-making," the report states.
And in the case of strong short-term investment returns, system leaders should "shore up" health care and pension benefits before "unwinding" any of the benefit reductions or contribution hikes included in the bills, according to the report.
Authors noted that the systems' actuarial assumptions between 7.75% and 8.25% are reasonable, but also said officials need to consider the potential for lower returns and prepare for that scenario.
While the report said the 30-year funding period is useful, it discouraged using it as an ideal funding guideline. It said boards should have the ability to make other changes to meet the 30-year period, including:
-
Reducing benefit multipliers up to 10%, and reducing cost of living adjustments
-
Boosting member contributions by up to 4% over four years.
-
Increasing final average salary periods up to seven years.
-
Aligning normal retirement age for non-safety forces with the Social Security retirement age.
-
Adjusting early retirement, survivor and disability benefits.
-
Strengthening language blocking salary spiking.
Leaders Respond:
Senate President Tom Niehaus (R-New Richmond) and Senate Minority Leader Eric Kearney (D-Cincinnati), who jointly sponsored the Senate measures, welcomed the actuarial report and called for quick action on the legislation in the lower chamber.
"We are pleased the independent actuarial study agrees with the Senate's unprecedented bipartisan effort to stabilize and strengthen Ohio's pension systems. The study recognizes that the reforms proposed by the pension systems and contained in the Senate sponsored legislation are 'appropriate' and 'significant,'" the lawmakers stated.
"In reference to passing pension reform legislation, the report states 'We see no valid reason for delay.' This study confirms the legislation passed by the Senate '...will put each of the five retirement systems in a much more solid financial position.' It is important to note, the Senate reforms do not require any additional taxpayer dollars.
"We appreciate our colleagues in the Senate for taking a bold stand to ensure all the state pension plans are on solid financial footing to protect the retirement benefits of millions of Ohioans. We encourage our colleagues in the House of Representatives to join us in passing this pension legislation without any further delay."
Speaker Batchelder said House members would review the report and could include details in legislation.
"With the release of this extensive and comprehensive report on Ohio's retirement systems, members of the Ohio House will carefully examine the findings of this report and, if necessary, incorporate these recommendations into legislation," he said in a statement.
"It is of the utmost importance that we use the information collected in this study to further our efforts to make Ohio's pension systems sustainable and cost-effective. I expect that the House will take action sometime this summer on this important issue that affects millions of Ohioans."